Postmodern theoryThis is a featured page






Thanks to Matt Kwan for the following video embed, which demonstrates a central tenet of Post-Modernism, namely the lack of originality:



Modernism, much influenced by WW1 seemed to express a belief that the world, life, had no 'meaning', that it made no sense. Poets in particular explored this idea - see TS Eliot's incredibly influential The Waste Land. Postmodernism is a development of this idea but, rather than seeing this polysemy as depressing thing, it often celebrates it.

A good starting point, taken from www.tes.co.uk:
'I don't know if there is a postmodernity. In English studies there is postmodernism, and there are millions of ways in which to define that, or in which to deny its existence. To me, it represents a change of attitude which seems to have taken effect from round about the middle of the twentieth century. There's the idea of the death of the author. This says that previously the author was God, and you suspended your belief, entered into the world of the story and did not question the narrator - well, most of the time, anyway. Then the audience started to think for itself and question things, and interpret stories according to its culture. There's the idea of deconstruction, in which, for example, previously-accepted stereotypes and their moral implications are undone - e.g. Uriah Heep (Dickens), Slim (Steinbeck) and Dr No (Fleming) have their gay stereotype employed to imply evil intentions. This one goes right back to the Summoner (Chaucer). The deconstruction bit is the audience's awareness of the process of stereotyping and its use to imply morality and otherwise: that audience-awareness undoes the malign effect and, one hopes, makes the literature more honest. There's the idea of the storyline being undone. Stories no longer need a beginning, middle and end, or a plot. They can be driven by some other aspect, such as collage, or they can be circular or partial or anything you like. There's the idea of characterisation being undone. In Victorian novels, for example, characters tended to represent moral aspects - a direct descendant of the medieval morality plays. Now they often have no moral aspect, and of course the anti-hero can be totally anti and no-one minds much. There's the neo-historicist approach, which tries to understand any piece of writing in the context in which it was written - an impossible ideal, because we can't help imposing our own concepts on history. There's the idea of mutual influence, in which past and present culture and politics influences art, and art influences contemporary and future culture and politics, and all art influences all other art, and everything is seen in the context of everything else. For example, Jane Eyre inspired the prequel about mad Mrs Rochester, The Far Sargasso Sea, which in turn can affect our interpretation of Jane Eyre when we re-read it, because Mrs R has now been given a voice.' (Perhaps relate to Harold Bloom's idea of 'The Anxiety of Influence'.)

Choose a film like Run Lola Run and use textual analysis to see how many of these ideas apply..
  • Director's Intention: Is the film obviously artificial? Does it even try to avoid drawing attention to its artificiality? How? Is Tykwer trying to get us to 'suspend our disbelief' and to accept that these things are 'real' (the intention of the approach defined by the use of continuity editing) or is it all clearly a construct? Is the point of watching the film to understand the director's 'intent'? Is there a 'message'? Is there any reason to believe that Tom Tykwer has an important 'message' just becasue he is good at making films? Why would a film-maker have a more important 'message' than a plumber or a fireman? Is this an example of 'the death of the author'? (A theory derived from Roland Barthes' work - we might think instead of 'The Death of the Auteur'...)
  • Plot: Is the plot 'realistic'? Does the plot matter? Is it 'undone'?
  • Reception of the Text: Is there a moral undertone? Are we expected to judge these characters according to some diegetic or non-diegetic moral code? Manni is, after all, a criminal - is he judged for this? Is there ANY moral at all? Or is this perhaps influenced by an existentialist world view wherein any 'moral' is entirely constructed by the audience? Compare older films, particularly those Hollywood efforts made under the auspices of the Hay's Code which were often viewed simply as vehicles for a moral message.
  • Editing & Neo-Historicism: The editing in this film seems to have influenced such later works as The Matrix. The opening sequence, for example, heavily influenced such mainstream films as Phone Booth. It could be argued, however, that those films use the same style a lot better. Does this affect how we watch Run, Lola, Run? Is this 'mutual influence'? CAN we take a neo-historicist approach and understand films as products of their historical context? Should we even try? If a film doesn't relat to me, here, now: then what good is it to me?



Patrick Philips identifies these main feature of postmodernism:

INTERTEXTUALITY

HYBRIDITY

PLAYFULNESS

SIGNIFICATION

IRONY


Do they apply to Run Lola Run?



Run Lola Run and postmodernism


Run Lola Run and Philosophy



Back to Film Theory Page


Back to IB Film Page




MrRyanSIS
MrRyanSIS
Latest page update: made by MrRyanSIS , Mar 26 2012, 10:22 AM EDT (about this update About This Update MrRyanSIS Edited by MrRyanSIS

1 widget added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: lola postmodernism run Tom Tykwer
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.
Adobe Portable Document Format Run_Lola_Run.pdf (Adobe Portable Document Format - 203k)
posted by MrRyanSIS   Jan 24 2011, 7:23 AM EST
Film Education Notes